Condition Suspecting & Recapture | Metriport
Metriport raises $26 million
Every suspect arrives with its evidence.
Discover conditions that should be presently diagnosed, but are not, based on a patient's longitudinal medical record.
Longitudinal record
| Date | PHQ-9 Score | Observation | Medication Request |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-14 | 14 | ||
| 2026-05-02 | Lithium carbonate, active fill | ||
| 2026-03-19 | Hemoglobin A1C 6.9 % | ||
| 2026-01-08 | GAD-7 score 11 |
Suspected conditions
| Condition | Code | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Major depressive disorder, recurrent | F33.1 | unconfirmed |
| Bipolar II disorder | F31.81 | unconfirmed |
| Type 2 diabetes, uncomplicated | E11.9 | unconfirmed |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | F41.1 | unconfirmed |
Join the teams finding what the problem list missed in the history they already hold.
Candidates for review, with the evidence attached.
| Condition | Verification Status | Evidence | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major depressive disorder, recurrent | unconfirmed | PHQ-9 score 14 · 2 encounters | F33.1 |
| Bipolar II disorder | unconfirmed | Lithium carbonate active fill | F31.81 |
| Type 2 diabetes, uncomplicated | unconfirmed | A1C 6.9% · metformin fill | E11.9 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | unconfirmed | GAD-7 score 11 · buspirone | F41.1 |
| Vascular disease | unconfirmed | Imaging impression · 1 encounter | I73.9 |
The record, screened against clinical definitions
The longitudinal history is screened for conditions that meet documented clinical definitions but appear nowhere on the problem list.
| Condition | Needs review | Code | Verification Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 diabetes | Yes | E11.9 | unconfirmed | A1C 6.9% · metformin fill |
Never an automatic diagnosis
Candidates arrive as unconfirmed FHIR Conditions for review. The problem list never changes on its own.
Evidence you can open
Each candidate carries its supporting Observations, Procedures, and MedicationRequests, so review starts from the proof.
Detection modes: Two Suspect
- Glucose ×2 E11.9 · not on file
- Recapture 2025 · E11.9 2026 · not on file
Suspect, recapture, and chronicity
New candidates, previously documented conditions due for review, and a separate chronic / non-chronic / unspecified enrichment.
Benefits
An empty chart is not an empty history.
Suspecting reads what you retrieved and says what to review.
Find the conditions your charts never mention.
A connected chart is not the same as a complete one. Screening the retrieved history surfaces the patients whose records exist elsewhere, and gives care teams something to treat against.
Problem list
| Your chart |
|---|
| Migraine without aura |
| Seasonal allergic rhinitis |
| Osteopenia |
| Type 2 diabetes, uncomplicated |
| A1C 6.9% · metformin fill · retrieved history |
Your clinicians stay the decision-makers.
Every output is an unconfirmed candidate with an ICD-10 code and its evidence. Review confirms or rejects it; nothing writes to the problem list automatically.
Risk work starts from more usable data.
Suspecting runs on the harmonized record, so candidates are computed from history that has already been coded and deduplicated, not from one source's fragment.
Coded once, mapped to risk
| Code | Condition | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| F33.1 | Major depressive disorder, recurrent | 155 |
| F31.81 | Bipolar II disorder | 154 |
| E11.9 | Type 2 diabetes, uncomplicated | 19 |
| F41.1 | Generalized anxiety disorder | Unmapped |
How it works
Suspecting only argues. The problem list stays yours.
- Evaluate the record against clinical definitions.
- Receive unconfirmed candidates.
- Query the consolidated record behind them.
FAQs
- Does condition suspecting automatically add diagnoses?
- No. It returns unconfirmed condition candidates for clinical or coding review and does not change the problem list automatically.
- Which resources can provide supporting evidence?
- The documented evidence resources are Observations, Procedures, and MedicationRequests.
- What is the difference between suspect and recapture?
- Suspect identifies a condition that may not have been documented, while recapture evaluates a condition documented previously that may need review again.
- How is chronicity classification different?
- Chronicity classification is a separate enrichment that labels coded conditions as chronic, non-chronic, or unspecified. It is not a confidence score or diagnosis.